« July 2006 | Main | September 2006 »

August 31, 2006

Frank on Afghanistan

Expect Afghanistan to take center stage (or at least occupy one of the three rings) in the coming weeks as Dems and Republicans use the fifth anniversary of 9/11 to remonstrate each other for insufficiently muscular tactics in the war on terror. Consider the op-ed by Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), a cogent response to Rumsfeld's opening salvo...

Barneyfrank_1 Afghanistan ignored

August 30, 2006, By Barney Frank (Boston Globe)

A WAR is missing. Sadly, it is not missing from the physical location in which it is taking place, and people continue to die as it is waged. But it has largely disappeared from our national debate, and that debate has been sorely distorted as a consequence.

The war in question is in Afghanistan, and it isn't missing because it's no longer of consequence -- in fact, conditions there appear to be deteriorating -- but because of a conscious, unfortunately successful effort by the Bush administration and its conservative allies to ignore it. That's because acknowledging the war there would invalidate their charge that their political opponents are unwilling to take a forceful stand against terrorism.

Continue reading "Frank on Afghanistan" »

August 30, 2006

Sea Change in the Judiciary?

Thier_1An excellent piece in the Times by Alex Thier, who advised the constitution and judicial reform process. The new slate of justices is one of the few positive developments in the past weeks, and may open the door a crack for the further reforms that he identifies as necessary...

Order in the Courts (NYT)
By J ALEXANDER THIER

Continue reading "Sea Change in the Judiciary?" »

August 29, 2006

Portraits of an Insurgency

These two images, generated using the MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base interactive map feature, show--in graphic terms--the striking expansion of terrorist attacks across Afghanistan over the past 4 years. Click here to see four-year progression. Each graph covers twelve months (September through September)

Tkb_terrorism_afg_2003_2

Tkb_terrorism_legend

 

 




9/2002-

9/2003


 




Tkb_terrorism_afg_2006_2





9/2005-

9/2006

 







Each of these data points do not represent armed attacks or incidents of violence, but incidents of terrorism as defined by a RAND team. And each dot represents multiple incidents, with the number indicated by dot's size. (MORE)

 

Continue reading "Portraits of an Insurgency" »

Suicide Attacks: By the Numbers

Reuters has compiled the following statistics on suicide bombings in Afghanistan since January 2005:

  • Attacks:                                                 64
  • Casualties :                                           181  (not including suicide bombers)
  • Wounded:                                             273
  • Attacks without casualties:                     31/64
  • Attacks where bombs go off accidentally:  6/64
  • Attackers pre-empted by police:                2

MOST FREQUENTLY HIT AREAS:

  • Kandahar:                                          31 attacks
  • Kabul:                                                 7 attacks
  • Herat/Khost:                                        3 attacks


FATALITIES         
                                Source: American Forces Press Service

  • People killed by suicide bombings (as of Aug 12):    124
    • Civilians:                          105
    • Afghan Army and Police:      14
    • Coalition servicemembers:    5
  • Percentage of dead who are civilians:                      84

Bombing in Helmand; 17 dead, 47 wounded

Afghan civilians yesterday suffered a devastating bombing (the country's third-most fatal) in Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand. Only two incidents in the past have caused so many fatalities, and each were suicide bombings in Kandahar. A Minnesota TV station has posted a video clip of the aftermath here (skip the ad).

Helmand, unlike Kandahar (17 attacks since 2005) and Kabul (7), has rarely been struck by suicide bombs. A government spokesman, the UN, and NATO all described the bomb as a suicide attack, while a Taliban spokesman has claimed that it was a remote-controlled bomb instead.

Suicide bomb kills 17, hurts 47 at market
LASHKAR GAH, (AP) — A suicide bomber targeting a former police chief blew himself up in a busy town market Monday in southern Afghanistan, killing 17 people and wounding 47. The Taliban claimed responsibility but in a rare move expressed sadness over the deaths of civilians...

Qari Yousaf Ahmadi, who claims to speak for the Taliban, said Monday's bombing was not a suicide attack but a remote-controlled bomb that had targeted a former Lashkar Gah police chief because he had served under the pro-communist government during the Soviet occupation of the 1980s. The former chief, who runs the market where the blast occurred, and his son were killed. 

Helmand In general, one should be skeptical of incident reports in Helmand, as attacks attributed to Taliban insurgents are sometimes the result of criminal violence instead (Helmand is a primary poppy producing region.) But this attack appears to be insurgency-elated, and Karzai today declared, without elaboration, that it had been carried out "at the instruction of foreigners."

August 22, 2006

On Vacation

Afghanistan Watch is inactive this week, but will be up and running starting Aug 28...

August 20, 2006

Pentagon studies examine 'mistakes' in Iraq, Afghanistan

Frustrated_rumsfeld Pentagon studies examine 'mistakes' in Iraq, Afghanistan

August 16 (CSM), by Tom Regan

Quietly admitting that operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have not gone as well as had been expected, the US military establishment has undertaken a complete review of its operations and strategy in those two countries, with the idea of identifying what went wrong, and fixing it before the US faces a similar conflict in the future.

Continue reading "Pentagon studies examine 'mistakes' in Iraq, Afghanistan" »

August 18, 2006

Intel Chief: “Pakistan has not given up its interference and aggression”

"Strongest comments yet" by an Afghan official on Pakistan's inaction. What sort of backlash will we see from Islamabad?

Afghan spy chief urges Pakistan action on enemies
August 17, 2006 (Reuters) KABUL - Pakistan is the main source of Afghanistan’s insecurity, the country’s intelligence chief said on Thursday, adding that there could be no peace here if the war against Islamic militants was not shifted to include Pakistan.

In the strongest comments by an Afghan official yet, director-general of intelligence Amruallah Saleh said enemy training sites and organisational and financial resources all lay inside Pakistan...

Continue reading "Intel Chief: “Pakistan has not given up its interference and aggression”" »

August 17, 2006

Guilty verdict for Passaro

Just reported:

Passaro_1 Ex-CIA contractor guilty of assault
Aug 16 (AP) By Estes Thompson

A former CIA contractor accused of severely beating an Afghan detainee with a flashlight during questioning was found guilty Thursday of assault. Photo: Passaro after his release in 2004.

Continue reading "Guilty verdict for Passaro" »

China to explore mining

A look at Afghanistan's Copper and CoalBbccopper300


China willing to invest in mining sector: Minister

KABUL, Aug 13 (Pajhwok Afghan News) by Zainab Mohammadi:
Minister for Mines engineer Mohammad Ibrahim Adil has said that Chinese investors are eager to invest in mining sector in Afghanistan...(article continued on 2nd page...)

Afghanistan--sometimes perceived as poor in natural resources--actually holds abundant reserves of oil and several mineable resources, especially copper, which may exist in vast quantities. With its neighbors in China and India hungry for new sources of energy and materials--and with new firms emerging that are willing to take greater risks--Afghanistan may not be a bad bet.

Copper_deposits Copper: Copper is currently at near record prices, recently hitting $3.50 a pound (versus its low of $0.70 per pound five years ago). One result has been the emergence of smaller mining companies that are less risk-averse than the big players.

The Wall Street Journal today ran a piece on how these "junior miners" were taking on large but previously unexploited deposits in Africa:

junior miners likely will play a bigger role, and possibly help bring commodity prices back to earth. That is because they are willing to operate in higher-risk areas, as many big players focus more on mergers and acquisitions than on developing new mines.

In the past year, junior miners accounted for 63% of the increase in exploration spending, a number which is expected to grow. 

Afghanistan would seem an appealing target
for these smaller firms. A BBC story in 2003 noted that:

According to Russian estimates, the area holds reserves of 11 billion tonnes, which would make it the biggest copper mining area in the world. The exploration area in question is in the Logar Province where mines were previously used by the Russians. An international consortium was also signed up to work in the area in 1998, but work was never carried out due to the civil war, and the mines fell into disrepair.

Afghanistan's copper mines have been highlighted in numerous economic reports as one potential area for future growth. But experts warn that the estimated reserves were never proved and some doubt that Afghanistan's geology could be so rich in copper.

An Afghan Government / British Geological Survey report notes that:

Afghanistan has yet to be evaluated in the light of modern mineral deposit models and improved analytical methods. From a global perspective, Afghanistan is relatively under explored and the potential for further discoveries of copper and other minerals is high.

Afghanistan's risks and unproven deposits are the sort of investment that big players would typically avoid--but which some of the junior miners might explore.

Coal_miner Coal:
Afghanistan has 73 million tons of coal reserves (located mostly in the north between Herat and Badashkan). This is not a vast stock, but in the early 1990s produced 100,000 tons of coal per year. With the Soviet departure and civil war, production trickled to 1,000 tons by the end of the decade (see Department of Energy Afghanistan Fact Sheet, 2004.) Currently the mines are moribund, decripit, and dangerous. But demand for coal is high, and mining has again drawn interest.  (Note: Photo on right is from a January 2006 photo essay on Afghanistan's coal mines by Patrick Andrade; you can see his work here.)

---

Of course, natural resources provide a Midas's curse for most developing countries. Weak states rich in mineral wealth are highly vulnerable, both to internal looting and external exploitation. In Africa, for example, research by Paul Collier suggests that the odds of a civil war in a given five-year period correlate with resource wealth (ranging from 1% in the resource poor to nearly 25% in the resource rich.)

Yet a new source of wealth would seem the last of Afghanistan's worries--especially since the nation is already awash in a lucrative and highly-lootable source of instability: the opium poppy.

Continue reading "China to explore mining" »

August 15, 2006

“It must be a strange world up there”

An inside view of a coalition airstrike

Ac130_footage02_2 VIDEO FEATURE: Click to play the footage: AC-130 over Afghanistan. (7 min 24 sec)

This video, apparently of a night strike against a Taliban camp, was posted anonymously on Google Video by a U.S. soldier who had access to the footage. The date portrayed is unclear, but it was originally posted on internet sites starting in 2002 or 2003. A thermal imagery spotting camera captures and records the images.

According to the comment by someone who re-posted it:

“This video appears to show an AC-130 doing its job very effectively, Its impresive accuracy and apparent ability to own every bad boy they see running about… I would love to have a chat with the guys that fly these things, it must be a strange world up there!”

There was a time in the heady days after the liberation of Kabul when air-power enthusiasts believed that Al Qaeda and the Taliban could be eliminated with few casualties by the use of precision munitions guided by small teams of special forces. Four years later, insurgents in Afghanistan, Iraq and southern Lebanon have defied this approach, avoiding defeat in the face of overwhelming air power. Insurgents have suffered losses, but have managed to remain solvent and to win the PR war by turning airpower's greatest advantage--its ability to strike at a distance--into its greatest liability by widely publicizing (and often exagerating) civilian casualties.

The AC-130 is precise, but the video also hints at the fog of war in which airstrikes inevitably occur. It shows pilots making life-and-death decisions based upon indistinct shapes below them. And, as in every case, airpower is only as precise as the intelligence that directs it. Regardless of precautions, mistakes occur. Here’s a provocative clip from the audio, which I tried my best to transcribe:

Ac1302_1Speaker 1:  “You do see the rectangular building next to it Greg?”
Speaker 2:  “Yes sir”
Speaker 1:  “That’s affirmative...That’s the mosque, do not engage the mosque.”

Speaker 2;  “Roger”
Speaker 3: “The square building is the mosque or is…”
Speaker 2: “The RECTANGLE! The Rectangle!”
Speaker 1: “The Rectangular building is the mosque.”

Speaker 3: “Roger that.”

Continue reading "“It must be a strange world up there” " »

Who's really committed to development?

2006cdiscore_graphwb Yesterday the Center for Global Development released its 2006 "Commitment to Development Index," a comprehensive look at development assistance that takes assess quality of aid as well as quantity.

Afghanistan is a prime example of how aid quantity can be secondary to its quality. Development has faltered because funding has followed donor priorities and bureaucratic processes, and in doing so has failed to strengthen Afghan government capacity. The need to rethink the foreign aid delivery system was a central finding of the Afghanistan Compact in2006_trends January.

The Commitment to Development Index does not look specifically at Afghanistan, but offers some insights into aid practices generally. Note that two of the top donors in Afghanistan (the US, and the UK) are ranked in the bottom half (though they have improved since 2003), while a third (Japan) claims last place.

Here's an except from the Index overview:

Each year the CDI rates and ranks 21 rich countries on how much their policies help or hurt poorer nations. The CDI assigns scores in seven policy areas (foreign aid, trade, investment, migration, environment, security, and technology), with the average being the overall score. The idea is to provide a much more comprehensive picture than the usual comparisons of donor nations on how much aid they give.

This year, the Netherlands moved into first, mainly because a conservative government in the formerly number-one Denmark has cut aid spending. Japan remains in last place as the country whose government is least engaged with developing countries. As in the past, the G-7 "leading industrial nations" have not led on the CDI; Germany, top among them, is in 9th place overall.

There's a lot more at their websites for the data junkies out there:

  • Browse the CDI charts by clicking bars, country names, and policy components
  • Explore the Data Maps to see results another way.
  • Read the Foreign Policy article here.

Continue reading "Who's really committed to development?" »

Farewell to Alex Baker

Alexbaker_1 Today the Century Foundation and Afghanistan Watch is losing a terrific writer, thinker, catalyst, and all-around good guy, Alex Baker. Alex was one of the founding members of Afghanistan Watch, and has been the technical guru behind the site (including its transition to the current format.) His contributions to Century over the past five years have been indispensible to bringing us into the new century.

Alex is going back to his hometown to get a Masters in Public Policy from the University of Chicago. I'm sure he'll do great things with it.

Congrats Alex, we'll miss you!

You can read some of Alex's articles here.

August 14, 2006

By the numbers

  • US military assistance to Pakistan since September 11:        $3.0 billion
  • Pakistani debt dismissed by the US since 9/11:                    $1.5 billion
  • Total Pakistan is spending on US-made F-16 jets:                $2.5 billion
  • Approximate annual foreign aid received by Afghanistan:   ~$2.5 billion

Source: Just whose side is Pakistan really on?
The Sunday Times (UK), August 13, 2006 by Christina Lamb

    Is the US getting its money worth from aid offered to Pakistan? In the article, Lamb quotes an unnamed US intelligence agent:

    “The moment I heard the first news about the airline plot, I knew it was just a matter of time until we heard the word Pakistan...Whether it’s 9/11, the Bali bombs, 7/7 and now this, Pakistan is always the connection. That’s gotta raise some questions."

    Click to read Just whose side is Pakistan really on?

    Drug Addiction Rates Soar

    Not a new story, but one worth repeating: the demand for Afghan narcotics comes not only from the West, but also from within the region (mostly in Pakistan and Iran, but increasingly in Afghanistan itself, as the story below reveals.)

    Afghan leaders have long complained that their cultivation of poppy was an inevitable response to the demands of infidels. The reality is that the demand for opium sap starts from much closer to home, and must be addressed there as well. The UK, the US, and Russia could end their heroin problem tomorrow and the demand for Afghan opium would not disappear (although profits for drug lords, criminal networks and corrupt officials would shrink, since it's the international trade that drives high revenues for middle men.)

    Poppy cultivation and trade is corrupting the lives and society of Afghans as well as westerners, and Afghan religious and community leaders should be more emphatic in their condemnation of all aspects of the drug trade.

    The erosion of norms against growing poppy is a major factor in the spread of cultivation to areas in which poppies were never grown before (once limited to a few regions, they are now farmed in every province.) This trend won't be reversed until Afghans come to terms with the pernicious effect that narcotics are having on their own society.  (click here for photos by Bejanmin Krain)

    Drug Addiction Rates Soar in War-Torn Afghanistan Voice of America Kabul, August 8 2006, By Benjamin Sand: The United Nations says addiction rates in war-torn Afghanistan have doubled in the past two years, to the point that nearly a million people are now using illegal drugs...

    Continue reading "Drug Addiction Rates Soar" »

    August 10, 2006

    Karzai: One term is enough?

    The latest: the usually diplomatic Karzai declares he won't run again.

    Why did he choose to announce this now, and what does it mean?  (Readers can now click on the comments tab below to post thoughts on the causes and implications...)

    Karzai: One term is enough
    KABUL, August 8 (Fortune Magazine) By Eric Ellis -- Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai has strongly suggested he will serve just one term as Afghan leader and not contest his country's next presidential election scheduled for 2009. In an exclusive interview with Fortune, the 49-year-old Karzai said, "I don't think it is good to be running all the time. Let other people get a chance to run."..

    Later, in a quote that will undoubtedly irk his Western backers, Karzai points the finger:

    Asked why he isn't a stronger leader, given his near unanimous support internationally, Karzai said, "The international community did not stand with me on these issues. They didn't four years ago, when I asked them to. I had to work through internal and external factors and take Afghanistan to where we are today. And I am very proud of that. [But] the international community could have helped us better."

    The rest of the excerpt is continued in the link below ("Continue reading "Karzai: One term is enough" ")...

    Continue reading "Karzai: One term is enough?" »

    August 09, 2006

    Back online!

    So, Afghanistan Watch has finally completed the switch-over to the new format.  Thanks to everyone for your help and patience. This new model has some great features that I think you'll enjoy--stay tuned!