Afghanistan Watch: Four steps to reduce civilian casualties

May 30, 2007

Four steps to reduce civilian casualties

Today Rick Inderfurth has a piece today arguing that civilian casualties are "rising to the top of the list" of woes in Afghanistan and setting out four steps to reduce them. Let's take a look:

First, the and NATO should publicly adopt the goal of "zero innocent civilian casualties," as recommended a year ago by retired General Barry McCaffrey...to accomplish this, military tactics must change to limit casualties even where this means, in McCaffrey's words, "Taliban units escape destruction by hiding among the people."

So this would essentially be an oath to 'first do no harm'...Such a declaration would be valuable, as long as it was actually observed.

Easier said than done--especially since the current command would tell you they are doing everything possible to avoid civilian deaths. It's clearly not working. McCaffrey, in a June memo (worth reading in its entirety), has some insights into how this approach might be operationalized:

We have to stay out of the cities and push the ANA [Afghan national army] with our backup into civil population control operations. We need to defer on the roads to the civil population while actively countering IED’s and suicide bombers. (Move convoys at night, build by-pass roads, get US military and AID infrastructure out of built-up areas, use ANP [Afghan national police] units to accompany our small unit convoy movements.) Suggest we need to concentrate on the ANA and the ANP…not on large unit US operations.

This requires a shift in how we operate, and a shift in priorities, but one that is not unimaginable. Inderfurth next advocates:

Second, more must be done to put "an Afghan face on operations," as called for by the former NATO commander in Afghanistan, General David Richards of Britain. This means closer coordination on military operations with the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Afghan National Army. Afghan soldiers should also be included in U.S. and NATO military actions to act as a buffer, a longstanding demand of Karzai. It is also imperative to work more closely with the local authorities and do more to respect Afghan sensibilities. U.S. and NATO policies regarding house searches and detentions of residents should be reconsidered.

This is really two recommendations in one: first a larger role for the Afghan military, and second, a shift in search/detention policies. Both are feasible and desirable, especially as the Afghan Army seems prepared to play a larger role.

Third, the United States should conclude a Status of Forces Agreement with Afghanistan. Such an agreement is intended to clarify the legal terms under which a foreign military is allowed to operate in a country, including locations of bases and access to facilities as well as matters affecting the relations between a military force and civilians. Nearly six years into the U.S. military campaign, a formal, binding understanding with the Afghan government is needed, in part to underscore the political message that the U.S. military is there at the invitation of the Afghan people, not as an "occupier" (which some Afghans are beginning to feel that it is).

Another good recommendation. The US has proceeded on this issue as if issuing a status of forces agreement would suggest a lack of resolve. It would do precisely the opposite. It would strengthen the credibility of our commitment by laying out, in terms that made sense to our adversaries and our allies, what America's interests and long-term goals in Afghanistan actually are. (I understand the Pentagon might see benefits to permanent bases in Afghanistan as forward positions to contain Iran and hedge against Russia and China. However, to let these goals drive US Afghanistan policy would be the height of folly, since even if they were valid--and I would question whether they are--they could better achieved in neighboring countries where their pursuit is cheaper and less counterproductive.) We are spending down our goodwill in Afghanistan quickly, and history suggests that once goodwill toward an occupying force is gone, it is gone forever.

Finally, NATO should set up a compensation fund for civilian deaths, injuries or property damage resulting from its military operations in Afghanistan. Since 2002 the United States has appropriated more than $12 million to help Afghan civilians harmed by U.S. operations. The funds are used for medical, rehabilitation and reconstruction aid. But NATO, as a whole, does not have an equivalent program.

Inderfurth implies that the US compensation program is a model, and perhaps it is--I had never seen this figure of $12 million before, which if it's accurate is a remarkable number. Nevertheless, there are some serious problems with the way the US doles out condolence money as well. For one thing, the 19 civilians who were killed by Marines Special Operations forces in March received a mere $2,000 for their loss, while the fifty injured received nothing but an apology. Moreover, as Jon Tracy notes in a May NYT op-ed, there has been a movement to conflate "compensation" payments with "condolence payments" :

Official compensation under the Foreign Claims Act acknowledges wrongdoing; a condolence payment explicitly denies wrongdoing, and the incident is considered, in effect, an accident of war. The Foreign Claims Act offers full compensation for the loss along the lines of what Americans can receive in civil court; condolence involves a nominal payment. But the military has conflated the two, giving condolence payments to the victims' families even as it has investigated and punished wrongdoing by our troops.

So yes, NATO should revisit its policies -- but so should the Pentagon...

Inderfurth's ideas are not new--but they deserve wide circulation at this juncture.

Posted by Carl Robichaud on May 30, 2007 at 04:38 PM in Afghan National Army, ISAF / NATO, Politics, Rule of Law, Security, Taliban, U.S. Policy | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d843653ef00e5508171858834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Four steps to reduce civilian casualties:

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by: |

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:

Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Post a comment

Comments

The United States has orchestrated an "empire of bases" around the globe with SOFAs. The terms imposed on weak states are typically unequal in the extreme. Is Karzai's government in any position to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement in Afghanistan's interest? The country's "Strategic Partnership" with the US has already accepted the idea of permanent bases--which Afghans voiciferously protested at the time it was signed. In this agreement posted on the White House web site (where the bullet points are all dollar signs), the wording suggests that the purpose of an enduring US military presence is to safeguard not only Afghanistan's security and [sic] sovereignty but also US investments and the capitalist economy being imposed through 'economic reforms.' Although Afghanistan needs dollars, and the US military badly needs a legal framework for its occupation of Afghanistan, especially regarding issues like the mode of house searches, civilian casualties, and just compensation for dead innocents and the wounded, it's wishful thinking to imagine that the typical SOFA would make things better rather than worse.

Posted by: J Larson | June 10, 2007 at 04:23 AM

Just a quick update on this great article: NATO does, in fact, have a compensation fund. CIVIC (Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict) began calling for one back in August of last year and in December 2006 the Netherlands led the charge to create the Post-Operations Humanitarian Relief Fund. Unfortunately, only four of the twenty-six NATO member countries have thus far donated - clearly not enough to really make a difference on the ground for Afghan Civilians.

Many thanks for your great suggestions,
Sarah Holewinski
Executive Director
CIVIC - Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict
www.warvictims.org

Posted by: Sarah Holewinski | June 22, 2007 at 06:25 PM

Yesterday, my boyfriend gave me a lot of Pirates of the Burning Sea Gold
I regard the buy potbs Doubloon as the gift to return him.
The potbs gold is attractive
I have plenty of the potbs Doubloon. so I use the potbs moneywith him toghther.

Posted by: potbs money | January 19, 2009 at 10:04 PM

I am so happy to get some Archlord gold and the Archlord money is given by my close friend

who tells me that the archlord online Gold is the basis to enter into the game. Therefore, I should buy Archlord gold with the spare money and I gain some cheap Archlord gold from other players.

Posted by: cheap Archlord gold | February 24, 2009 at 12:43 AM

Do you know shadow of legend Gold? I like it..
My brother often go to the internet bar to buy sol gold and play it.
After school, He likes playing games using these buy shadow of legend Gold with his friends.
I do not like to play it. Because I think that it not only costs much money but also spend much time. One day, he give me many cheap shadow of legend Goldand play the game with me.
I came to the bar following him and found shadow of legend Gold moneywas so cheap. After that, I also go to play game with him.

Posted by: shadow of legend Gold | March 14, 2009 at 05:18 AM

Paul Smith
Paul Smith Sale
cheap paul smith wallets
buy paul smith wallet
paul smith leather wallets
Paul smith men's wallet
paul smith women's wallets
Paul Smith Wallets
Paul Smith Bags
Paul Smith Necktie
Paul Smith Notebook
Paul Smith Belts
Paul Smith Shoes
Paul Smith Trainers
Paul Smith Cufflinks
Paul Smith">Paul Smith T-shirts
buy paul smith belt
Paul Smith Authentic
paul smith belt
paul smith belts
black leather suit belt
Paul Smith Blonde Naked Lady Belt
trainers uk
trainers shop
trainers reviews
health trainer
trainers sale
new trainers
comfortable Trainer

Posted by: sunny | May 15, 2009 at 04:00 AM

Links of London
Links of London Jewelry
Links of London Charm
Links of London Necklace
Links of London Bracelets
Links of London Earrings
Links of London Rings
Designer from UK
Diamond
GoldSilver
Links Jewelry
Links Necklace
Links Charm
Links Earrings
Links Rings

Posted by: links of london | May 20, 2009 at 02:15 AM

nike shox

nike shox nz

nike shox R2

nike shox R3

nike shox R4

nike shox TZ

nike shox R4 Torch

nike shox Turb

Posted by: kicksadidas | May 25, 2009 at 08:16 AM

nike store,air max shoes,dunk sb shoes,nike shox shoes

Posted by: shgd | June 05, 2009 at 10:05 PM

Posted by: ANY | June 08, 2009 at 01:04 PM

puma shoes

Posted by: angel | June 09, 2009 at 02:46 AM

Hunting to buy wow gold and wow power leveling service?I know there are still masses of gamers are looking around for more WoW Gold, the essential currency in the game. As we know sometimes the process of gaining wow gold is tedious, let alone when you are busy. Of course it is also fit for WoW Power Leveling. Then how to get it? Don’t worry, there is another way to get cheap wow gold, you don’t need to spend too much energy and time on obtaining cheapest wow gold. Yup, Buy WoW Gold from those gold sellers online. What you need is just to find one professional and reliable shop and cost a little money, then you can buy cheap wow gold as soon as possible. It is really a good way, right? Ok, then why do you hesitate? Go to have a try and get your Cheap WoW Goldand wow power leveling service now.

Posted by: wow gold | June 11, 2009 at 05:59 AM

ugg boots nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian | June 11, 2009 at 08:25 PM

If you are interested in this wow power leveling guide, please pay more attention to us, we would provide you with more info about Cheap WoW Gold and WoW Power Leveling. If wanna Buy WoW Gold, here is the right place, too. We have plenty WoW Gold in stock, and promise to offer cheap wow gold for those loyal customers in an instant. Moreover, you can free contact us any time with any question on wow power leveling and wow gold. We are live 24/7. So it is safe to buy wow gold from us. Now come with me and get your cheapest wow gold here. Ok, buy cheap wow gold and save your time!