I've been trying to figure out from media reports whether the recently announced "explosively formed penetrators" (EFPs) are different from the "shaped charges" that have been used by insurgents in Afghanistan for several years (see this story from Scott Baldauf and Ashraf Khan in September 2005, which talks about the adaptation of shaped charges from Iraq.)
So far it sounds like EFPs are a specific type of shaped projectile, and are based on technology which is neither new nor technically demanding. A recent story in Jane's Defense observes that "the knowledge required to manufacture and use EFPs may have become so widespread that Iranian assistance is no longer required" and Wired's David Hambling notes that typically "designs and 'recipes' are likely passed between groups online...giving terrorists a major boost in their arms race against countermeasures."
Some sources claim that the discovery of EFPs in Afghanistan is proof that Iran is supporting the Taliban against coalition forces. This prompts the question: if EFPs used today in Afghanistan were produced by Iran, does that suggest that the ones used there in years past were of Iranian origin as well? (If they were, that does not mean, of course, that Iranians were supporting the Taliban at that time, since it is possible that arms they sent to Iraq made their way over to Afghanistan or that the weapons were sold by smugglers...the same is true today.)
If you have thoughts on this, let us know in the comments section...
I know that Iranian markings on some munitions are being pushed as evidence of involvement (though I have my doubts as to what that actually proves, aside from people buying Iranian arms).
As for EFPs, they are basically just a type of shaped charge - and have been around since at least the assassination of Alfred Herrhausen in 1989.
A normal shaped charge is conical and gets much of its energy from the kinetic force of impacting on an armored surface, while the EFP gets all its energy from the physics of directing and focusing the explosive energy of the device itself.
The strange thing is, EFPs are actually less "dangerous" than a normal shaped charge because they can only penetrate steel as thick as their diameter (larger shaped charges, like those found on anti-tank missiles, can penetrate 6-10x their diameter of armor).
Hope that helps!
Posted by: Joshua Foust | June 28, 2007 at 01:33 PM
Carl:
EFPs are a kind of shaped charge, yes.
Posted by: Noah Shachtman | June 28, 2007 at 02:23 PM
EFPs are not shaped charges in the same sense that a bullet (projectile) is not an entire rifle cartridge.
The EFP is more like the bullet component of a rifle cartridge, whereas the shaped charge acts more like the gunpowder.
Basically, the EFP starts life as a convex sheet of malleable metal (like copper) who lives on top of a cylinder of explosive. When the explosive goes off, the shockwave bends the copper into something that looks like the top of a blowpop. Only this blowpop is moving really, really fast, like 1-2 km/s. At these velocities, solids act like liquids when they are struck, thus the armor penetrating power.
Posted by: John Anderson | August 27, 2008 at 11:39 PM
just to reflect on the comment left by joshua foust. in my opinion efp's are more dangerous than a shape charge. an efp slices through armor like a hot knife through butter, capable of cutting holes through multiple abrams tanks igniting any flamable materials that it comes in contact with. but yes an efp is a type of shape charge. it just moves at a higher velocity and can pierce thicker armor than a conventional shape charge which uses melted glass instead of metal.
Posted by: tim burrus | November 06, 2008 at 12:11 PM
EFP are not a shape charge in the doctrinal sense. RPGs are shape charges, RKG, and most other AT munitions. The difference is shape charges utilize a molten jet to cut the armor. EFPs are solid and do not transition to a molten state. The projectile is moves so fast that it breaks apart and creates a compound impact effect that drives through the armor. Speed is what makes the efp deadly not a jet.
Posted by: Ranger Cannon | November 17, 2008 at 11:53 AM
buy wow gold while the results of. buying gold world of warcraft the study are a brief public. cheap wow gold triumph for gamers. cheap wow gold a comment by one of . cheap wow gold the researchers is cause. cheapest wow gold for a bit of eyebrow raising. clé cd “This will help us to . eve isk develop a emotion and gaming . free online war games questionnaire to help distinguish the.
Posted by: asdf | January 14, 2009 at 09:30 PM
sell wow gold type of gamer who is likely to . world of warcraft gold transfer their online aggression . wow into everyday life. wow ”I'm definitely all for removing . wow acc the psyche-shattered nutters. wow authentication that can't distinguish the. wow card
Posted by: asdf | January 14, 2009 at 09:32 PM
I always heard something from my neighbor that he sometimes goes to the internet bar to play the game which will use him some rf gold,
he usually can win a lot of rf online gold,
he let his friends all have some rf money,
his friends thank him very much for introducing them the rf cp, they will play the game and share their cheap rf gold
Posted by: cheap rf gold | January 19, 2009 at 10:31 PM
http://www.google.com.tr/search?hl=tr&q=site:www.afghanistanwatch.org/2007&start=70&sa=N
Posted by: ugr | January 31, 2009 at 04:26 PM
coupling
stair lift
stair lifts
stairlifts
stairlift
wheelchair ramps
access ramps
disabled ramps
mobility scooters
mobility scooter
wheelchairs
wheelchair
designer bag
handbag wholesale
replica bag
Japan tour
Japan tours
Japan holiday
louis vuitton replica
handbag replica
laser engraver
wheelchair ramp
mass mailer
bulk mailer
mass email sender
bulk email sender
bulk mailer
Posted by: dfgsdg | February 01, 2009 at 03:57 AM